stereogogl.blogg.se

Photoscape x nik collection
Photoscape x nik collection













  1. Photoscape x nik collection update#
  2. Photoscape x nik collection 32 bit#

I just want to settle on a consistent workflow. It may be that I use Rawtherapee for the demosaicing and assigning a DCP, export to TIFF, and edit those in darktable, luminar, or gimp as needed. That being said without all the add ons I have it would be much more limited, but I think it would be easy for a photoshop user to use.įrom what I am seeing it doesn't look like photo ninja takes DNG profiles (DCP), correct? The GUI is very close to Photoshop's own, not sure what it used to be like but when I've seen Photoshop videos on youtube I generally feel like I could jump straight into photoshop without skipping a beat. I have been using GIMP for a while and have several plug ins (GMIC, NIK Collection, Darktable, Rawtherapee, and many more as well as various scripts and other user-created plugins).

Photoscape x nik collection 32 bit#

GIMP now handles 16 & 32 bit files, both as floating point and as integer. I long shied away from GIMP as it was 8-bit only, but the new version 2.8(?) is now capable of handling larger bit depths.However, the learning curve is *steep*. If it had DCP support it would be a happy median between Luminar and Darktable.ĭoes anyone have any recommendations for an editor that supports dcp files? Actually really like this, but it lacks DCP support. If anyone uses this software and has encountered and somehow fixed this, let me know what you did please! There are other bugs as well, and the program is just slow doing basic things even when your computer exceeds the recommended specs.

Photoscape x nik collection update#

I'm not the only one to experience this, and Skylum has kept promising to fix it in an incremental update but never do. This holds true regardless of whether or not it is in the DNG format, and it's not specific to a particular camera. In other words, it acts as if undemosaiced raw files are demosaiced. While it has masking, layering, and DCP support, it often doesn't recognize raw files as raw which prevents applying one. This software is kind of a joke, in my opinion. Lacks any sort of masking features or layering. If DT had this, it'd be perfect for my needs. I would be using it for more than just UV photos Each is missing one or more features that I'd like to have as part of my workflow. Lately I have become rather frustrated with the software I have for photo editing.

photoscape x nik collection

Not sure if this is really appropriate to post here or not, but it's the closest to an 'off topic' section I see.















Photoscape x nik collection